Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence:
1. That [Defendant] operated or managed an interest in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering activity?
Answer Yes or No _____________
2. State if you unanimously find that [Plaintiff] proved by a preponderance of the evidence that [Defendant] committed any of the following acts:
Category 1: Mail Fraud
As to Racketeering Act 1A:
(Example: Invoice dated A from Defendant to Plaintiff)
Answer Proved or Not Proved _____________
As to Racketeering Act 1B:
(Example: Invoice dated B from Defendant to Plaintiff)
Answer Proved or Not Proved _____________
As to Racketeering Act 1C:
(Example: Invoice dated C from Defendant to Plaintiff)
Answer Proved or Not Proved _____________
Category 2: Wire Fraud
As to Racketeering Act 2A:
(Example: E-mail dated A from Defendant to X, copying Plaintiff)
Answer Proved or Not Proved _____________
As to Racketeering Act 2B:
(Example: Fax dated B from Defendant to Plaintiff)
Answer Proved or Not Proved _____________
As to Racketeering Act 2C:
(Example: Wire transfer dated C from Plaintiff to Defendant)
Answer Proved or Not Proved _____________
Category 3: Interstate Transportation of Stolen Property
As to Racketeering Act 3A:
(Example: Transmission in interstate commerce of funds of $5,000 or more known to have been taken by fraud)
Answer Proved or Not Proved _____________
If you found in paragraph 1 above that [Defendant] is liable on Count 1, what is the amount of damages, if any, that you find was proximately caused by the violation?