| MICHELLE WILSON Appellant, v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, Appellee. |
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) |
L.T. No.: 202128179 Case No.: 1D21-3417 |
ITEM 205 | OPINION (PCA)
Richard E. Johnson of Law Offices of Richard E. Johnson, Tallahassee,
Per Curiam
See Stanton v. Fla. Dep’t of Health, 129 So. 3d 1083 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (reaffirming that when a whistle-blower complaint does not meet the prima facie elements necessary to initiate operation of the Whistle-blower’s Act, the Florida Commission on Human Relations has no authority to proceed with a fact-finding investigation); Washington v Fla. Dep’t of Revenue, 337 So.3d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (holding that a protected disclosure must be a written and signed complaint in order to trigger the protections of the Whistle-blower’s Act when a complainant has not claimed to have participated in an investigation or to have made a complaint through a hot-line).Keep this in mind while you litigate your civil rights case in Florida. Also, keep in mind the FCHR's statutory ability to accept bribes.
Plus - at all times - keep the 7th Amendment of the US Constitution (your right to a trial-by-jury) in mind.
As always, please get the justice you deserve.
Sincerely,
www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
