Art. VII §1 | COURTS IN WHICH JUDICIAL POWER VESTED
Notes
NOTE:
A prior Section 1 of Article VII was repealed by State Question No. 448, Legislative Referendum No. 164, adopted at election held on July 11, 1967. Repeal proposed by Laws 1967, p. 698, H.J.R. No. 508.NOTE:
Pursuant to 2010 H.J.R. No. 1056, State Question 755 proposed an amendment to this section. State Question 755 was submitted to and approved by the people at the November 2, 2010 general election. On November 29, 2010, an injunction was issued, and election results for State Question 755 were not certified. See Awad v. Ziriax, 754 F.Supp.2d 1298, affirmed 670 F.3d 1111. On August 15, 2013, a permanent injunction was issued enjoining state officials from certifying the election results. See Awad v. Ziriax, 966 F.Supp.2d 1198.This material might help you recover from the damages that lawbreaking judges/lawyers/agencies/organizations have inflicted upon you [and/or the public] (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).
Perhaps it'll [even] help you navigate through your state's administrative gauntlet. A gauntlet which might include – but not be limited to:
- State Agency Bribery;
- State Agency Corruption;
- State Agency Obstruction; and
- State Agency Self-Discrimination
Sincerely,
www.TextBookDiscrimination.com


