Legal Standards of Review
– The Established Citations –
Plenary Review

With respect to Sentencing Guidelines issues, this Court reviews "purely legal questions de novo, a district court's factual findings for clear error, and, in most cases, a district court's application of the guidelines to the facts with `due deference.'" United States v. Rodriguez-Lopez, 363 F.3d 1134, 1136-37 (11th Cir. 2004) (quoting United States v. White, 335 F.3d 1314, 1317 (11th Cir.2003)).

We review a district court's grant of summary judgment de novo , considering the facts and drawing all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Mann v. Taser Int'l, Inc. , 588 F.3d 1291, 1303 (11th Cir. 2009).

We exercise plenary review over the district court's grant of summary judgment. Chapman v. Klemick, 3 F.3d 1508, 1509 (11th Cir. 1993).

Mr. Hollis argues that the district court erred in dismissing the action due to improper venue under state law. Our review of the district court's decision is plenary. See, e.g., Peterson v. BMI Refractories, 124 F.3d 1386, 1390 (11th Cir. 1997).