HomeAboutContact | ...loading... iconUpArrow

48 FAR 180 | 9/15/2022 | NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES

DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES
AGENCYFLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
FILENAMEF003722_20220915.pdf
MEETING DATE
MEETING TIME
RULE NO60Y-5.001
TITLEComplaints
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY760.06(12) and 760.11(14), F.S.
LAW IMPLEMENTED760.06, 760.10, 760.11(1), F.S.
CONTACTCasey Snipes
EMAILCasey.Snipes@FCHR.MyFlorida.com
PHONE(850) 488-7082
ORIGINATORCheyanne Costilla, Executive Director
APPROVERFlorida Commission on Human Relations' board
PROPOSAL DATE7/29/2021
PUBLISH DATE9/14/2022

Purpose

The rule amendments seek to clarify the Florida Commission on Human Relations' amendment process.

Summary

The amendments specify a more streamlined process that will no longer allow an amendment due to a missing signature.

Regulatory Costs

The Agency has determined that this will not have an adverse impact on small business or likely increase directly or indirectly regulatory costs in excess of $200,000 in the aggregate within one year after the implementation of the rule. A SERC has not been prepared by the Agency.

The Agency has determined that the proposed rule is not expected to require legislative ratification based on the statement of estimated regulatory costs or if no SERC is required, the information expressly relied upon and described herein:
The proposed rule amendment is to a procedural rule and will have no economic impact and, therefore, will not require ratification. There are no applicable federal standards that relate to Rule 60Y-5.001.
Any person who wishes to provide information regarding a statement of estimated regulatory costs, or provide a proposal for a lower cost regulatory alternative must do so in writing within 21 days of this notice.

Notification

IF REQUESTED WITHIN 21 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, A HEARING WILL BE SCHEDULED AND ANNOUNCED IN THE FAR.

FULL TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE

60Y-5.001 Complaints.

(1) through (2) No change.

(3) Place and Date of Filing. A written complaint may be filed at the office of the Commission. The date of filing shall be the date of actual receipt of the signed and verified complaint by the Clerk or other agent of the Commission. Any document received by the Clerk or other agent of the Commission after 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) shall be filed as of 8:00 a.m. on the next regular business day.

(4) through (6) No change.

(7) Amendments.
(a) A complaint may be reasonably and fairly amended within 60 days after filing and, thereafter, for good cause with the consent of the Executive Director upon discovery of new facts or upon a finding that information previously provided by the respondent was misrepresented.

(b) A complaint may be amended to cure technical defects, or omissions, other than a missing signature or including verification, or to clarify and amplify allegations made therein. Such amendments and amendments which describe an additional unlawful employment practice related to or growing out of the subject matter of the original complaint will relate back to the date the complaint was first received.

(c) An amendment adding or changing a respondent will relate back to the date the complaint was first received if, within the period provided by subsection (2), the new respondent (i) has received such notice of the filing of the complaint as is sufficient to avoid prejudice in a defense on the merits, and (ii) knew or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning identity of the proper respondent, the complaint would have been filed against the new respondent.
(8) through (10) No change.
Congratulations! You're now booked up on this Notice of Proposed Rules from the 9/15/2022 Issue of the Florida Administrative Register (48 FAR 180)!

It might abreast you of certain affairs which could help you recover from the damages that lawbreaking judges/lawyers/agencies have inflicted upon you [and/or the public] (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).
Also, please beware that the FCHR (ie, the exclusive author of these pertinent notices) has corrupted itself. Thereby doing so in the following ways (among others):
Nevertheless, please stay vigilant; and – as always – please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell!

Help Others

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

TBD Marketplace™
iconWebsite
Buy™Sell™Shop™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Sell™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell! Help thousands of other litigants who [will] find themselves in your shoes!
Sell™ Now
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Buy™

buy real-live sample court documents/templates

– for free! (ie, with Book Points™)

Sell™

sell your court documents/templates

(earn 1,000 Book Points™ per file)

Shop™ Now

enter the TBD Marketplace™

to help your fellow man/woman

get the justice that he/she deserves!

logoAdobe Download
logoWebsite FCHR 101: How it Works
YouTubeVideo A Judge's Perjury
logoCases A Judge's Perjury
logoGraph Analysis: Pro Se & Race Status
logoHandbook Handbooks
iconWebsite How-To: Declaratory Statements
logoHTML Lists: Attorneys
logoReports Reporter Series
logoRules Rules
logoSamples Sample Court Documents
logoSurvey Survey
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Bribery
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Corruption
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Discrimination
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Obstructions
Pages That You
Might Also Like
All-in-One All-in-One (Rules Proposals)
60Y-2.008 FAC 28-109.104 FAC §286.011 FS Administrative Procedures Act
FACs - Employment Discrimination FACs - General FACs - Housing Discrimination FACs - Pub. Accommodations FACs - Whistleblower
Civil Rights Attorneys - FL
All-in-One
Reports: FCHR Annual Reports: FCHR Regulation
Fla. R. App. P. Fla. R. Civ. P. Fla. R. Crim. P. Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin.
All Pertinent Laws (Florida)
Buffa v Singletary, 652 So. 2d 885 (1DCA 1995) Gadsden v Lewis, 348 So. 2d 343 (1DCA 1977) Kearse v DHRS, 474 So. 2d 819 (1DCA 1985)
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike UniApp
1.0
iconFullScreenBgnIticonFullScreenEndIt
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG