ITEM 10.03 | THIRD PARTY BAD FAITH ACTIONS

The lawyer-client privilege between an insurer, the insured and insured’s counsel is not waived in a third party bad faith action. Since the insured is not the party bringing the action, it does not waive the privilege.²⁴

Footnotes

²⁴ Progressive v. Scoma, 975 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“Few evidentiary privileges are as jealously guarded as the attorney-client privilege. Permitting a third party who brings a bad faith claim to abrogate the attorney-client privilege previously held by the insured and insurer would seem to undermine the policy reasons for having such a privilege, such as encouraging open and unguarded discussions between counsel and client as they prepare for litigation.”).

Congratulations! You're now booked up on Item 10.03 from Florida's Handbook on Civil Discovery Practice (2016)!
You might need to reference it during your pursuit of justice.

For instance, you might need to examine this item in order to protect yourself from organizations/judges/lawyers who break the law (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).

Nevertheless – and as always – please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,

www.TextBookDiscrimination.com

	Download
	FCHR 101: How it Works
	Audio: Drop the Steal
	Video: A Judge's Perjury
	A Judge's Perjury
	How-To: Disqualification
	Warning: FCHR Bribery
	Warning: FCHR Corruption
	Warning: FCHR Discrimination
	Warning: FCHR Obstructions

ITEM 10.03 | THIRD PARTY BAD FAITH ACTIONS

Footnotes

Pages That You
Might Also Like

add a comment

thank you, come again!
TBD 1.037

Submit a Quiz Question

That Will Test Another User's Page-Specific Knowledge

	Shop \| TBD Marketplace™
	Buy \| TBD Marketplace™
	Sell \| TBD Marketplace™

ITEM 10.03 | THIRD PARTY BAD FAITH ACTIONS

Footnotes

Pages That YouMight Also Like

add a comment

thank you, come again!TBD 1.037

Submit a Quiz Question

That Will Test Another User's Page-Specific Knowledge

Pages That You
Might Also Like

thank you, come again!
TBD 1.037