HomeAboutContact | ...loading... iconUpArrow

47 FAR 49 | 3/12/2021 | NOTICE OF NEGOTIATED RULEMAKING

DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES
AGENCYFLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS
FILENAMEF003329_20210312.pdf
MEETING DATE
MEETING TIME
RULE NO60Y-5.004
TITLEExecutive Director’s Investigatory Determination; Notice
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY760.06(12), FS.
LAW IMPLEMENTED760.03(7), 760.06, 760.10, 760.11, FS.
CONTACTCasey Snipes
EMAILCasey.Snipes@FCHR.MyFlorida.com
PHONE(850) 907-6785
ORIGINATOR
APPROVER
PROPOSAL DATE
PUBLISH DATE

Purpose

The proposed rule amendments seek to clarify and delete obsolete, unnecessary, or redundant rules.

Subject Area to be Addressed

The proposed rules clarify proceedings upon complaints of unlawful employment practice.

Notification

IF REQUESTED IN WRITING AND NOT DEEMED UNNECESSARY BY THE AGENCY HEAD, A RULE DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP WILL BE NOTICED IN THE NEXT AVAILABLE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE REGISTER.

PRELIMINARY TEXT OF THE PROPOSED RULE DEVELOPMENT

60Y-5.004 Executive Director’s Investigatory Determination; Notice.

(1) Upon completion of an investigation, if a complaint has not been settled or withdrawn, the Office of Employment Investigations shall report the investigation, with recommendation, to the Office of General Counsel. The Office of General Counsel shall review the report and shall make a recommendation to the Executive Director as to whether there is reasonable cause to believe that an unlawful employment practice has occurred.

(2) If the recommendation is based upon lack of jurisdiction over the respondent or subject matter of the complaint or upon untimely filing of the complaint, the Executive Director may dismiss the complaint pursuant to subsection 60Y-5.006(3) or (11), F.A.C., provided that the investigation does not reveal any disputed issues of material fact. The Executive Director shall issue a determination on the foregoing bases of lack of jurisdiction or untimeliness where disputed issues of material fact appear to exist.

(3) After a determination has been made by the Executive Director, the Clerk shall serve a Notice of Determination, with copies of the determination, upon the complainant and the respondent.

(4) A Notice of Determination of Reasonable Cause shall include an invitation to participate in conciliation and shall advise the complainant of the elective right to file either a Petition for Relief, pursuant to Rule 60Y-5.008, F.A.C., within 35 days of the date of determination or a civil action within one year of the date of determination. A Petition for Relief form, in blank, shall be provided to the complainant at the time of service of the notice.

(5) A Notice of Determination of No Reasonable Cause, No Jurisdiction or Untimeliness shall advise the complainant of the right to file a Petition for Relief, pursuant to Rule 60Y-5.008, F.A.C., within 35 days of the date of determination. A Petition for Relief form, in blank, shall be provided to the complainant at the time of service of the notice.

(6) If a Petition for Relief is not filed with the Commission within 35 days of the date of determination, the Commission will take no further action and will close the matter.

(67) After service of a Notice of Determination, the parties named in the determination may inspect the records and documents, in the custody of the Commission, which pertain to the determination. The Executive Director may direct that a particular record, document or portion thereof be withheld from inspection by a party only when necessary for the protection of a witness or third party, or for the preservation of a trade secret.
Congratulations! You're now booked up on this Notice of Negotiated Rulemaking from the 3/12/2021 Issue of the Florida Administrative Register (47 FAR 49)!

It might abreast you of certain affairs which could help you recover from the damages that lawbreaking judges/lawyers/agencies have inflicted upon you [and/or the public] (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).
Also, please beware that the FCHR (ie, the exclusive author of these pertinent notices) has corrupted itself. Thereby doing so in the following ways (among others):
Nevertheless, please stay vigilant; and – as always – please get the justice you deserve.

Sincerely,



www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell!

Help Others

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

TBD Marketplace™
iconWebsite
Buy™Sell™Shop™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Sell™
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Earn 1,000 Book Points for every sample document (and/or template) that you sell! Help thousands of other litigants who [will] find themselves in your shoes!
Sell™ Now
iconWebsite
TBD Marketplace™

Buy™ | Sell™ | Shop™

Buy™

buy real-live sample court documents/templates

– for free! (ie, with Book Points™)

Sell™

sell your court documents/templates

(earn 1,000 Book Points™ per file)

Shop™ Now

enter the TBD Marketplace™

to help your fellow man/woman

get the justice that he/she deserves!

logoAdobe Download
logoWebsite FCHR 101: How it Works
YouTubeVideo A Judge's Perjury
logoCases A Judge's Perjury
logoGraph Analysis: Pro Se & Race Status
logoHandbook Handbooks
iconWebsite How-To: Declaratory Statements
logoHTML Lists: Attorneys
logoReports Reporter Series
logoRules Rules
logoSamples Sample Court Documents
logoSurvey Survey
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Bribery
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Corruption
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Discrimination
iconWarning Warning: FCHR Obstructions
Pages That You
Might Also Like
All-in-One All-in-One (Rulemaking)
60Y-2.008 FAC 28-109.104 FAC §286.011 FS Administrative Procedures Act
FACs - Employment Discrimination FACs - General FACs - Housing Discrimination FACs - Pub. Accommodations FACs - Whistleblower
Civil Rights Attorneys - FL
All-in-One
Reports: FCHR Annual Reports: FCHR Regulation
Fla. R. App. P. Fla. R. Civ. P. Fla. R. Crim. P. Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin.
All Pertinent Laws (Florida)
Buffa v Singletary, 652 So. 2d 885 (1DCA 1995) Gadsden v Lewis, 348 So. 2d 343 (1DCA 1977) Kearse v DHRS, 474 So. 2d 819 (1DCA 1985)
add a comment
IconQuiz IconLike UniApp
1.0
iconFullScreenBgnIticonFullScreenEndIt
Icon-Email-WBIcon-Email-WG Icon-Youtube-WBIcon-Youtube-WG Icon-Share-WBIcon-Share-WG