§12A | RIGHT TO HUNT, FISH, AND HARVEST WILDLIFE
Footnotes
The last paragraph of HCR 30 provides as follows:
“BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Tat the Attorney General of the State of Mississippi shall submit this resolution, immediately upon adoption by the Legislature of the State of Mississippi, to the Attorney General of the United States or to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in accordance with the provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended and extended.”However, after the bill was approved, the United States Supreme Court, in the case of Shelby County v. Holder (June 25, 2013), struck down the coverage formula that determined what jurisdictions are subject to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, so the coverage formula can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdictions to preclearance under Section 5.
Because of the Shelby County decision, the United States Attorney General is not making any determinations under Section 5 on voting or election changes made by states. The Supreme Court did not strike down Section 5, so it is still in effect. For that reason, the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office submitted House Concurrent Resolution 30 (2012) to the United States Attorney General in order to technically meet the requirements of Section 5 and fulfill the Legislative direction in the final paragraph of the Resolution.
By letter dated March 6, 2014, the United States Attorney General responded that he is not making determinations on the merits of any bill that is submitted under Section 5. The submission of HCR 30 (2012) and the response from the United States Attorney General technically met the requirements of Section 5 and fulfilled the Legislative direction in the final paragraph of the Resolution.
This material might help you recover from the damages that lawbreaking judges/lawyers/agencies/organizations have inflicted upon you [and/or the public] (see this example of a Florida judge who outright committed perjury).
Perhaps it'll [even] help you navigate through your state's administrative gauntlet. A gauntlet which might include – but not be limited to:
- State Agency Bribery;
- State Agency Corruption;
- State Agency Obstruction; and
- State Agency Self-Discrimination
Sincerely,
www.TextBookDiscrimination.com
