Mr. Perkins argues that the district court was obligated to recuse sua sponte and that the district court erred when it denied Mr. Perkins’s pro se motion to recuse before his sentencing hearing. We review these arguments under the abuse of discretion standard. United States v. Berger, 375 F.3d 1223, 1227 (11th Cir.2004).
RECUSAL
STANDARD OF REVIEW = ABUSE OF DISCRETION
Please get the justice you deserve.
Sincerely,
www.TextBookDiscrimination.com








